How Do We Stem Gun Violence in America?

Copyright alptraum / 123RF Stock PhotoAmerican women are 11 times more likely to be murdered by someone using a gun than women in other democratic countries with developed economies, according to a presenter at convention panel today on gun violence prevention.

That statistic, revealed by Jacquelyn White, PhD, of the University of North Carolina at Greensboro, was one of several sobering facts discussed at the session, entitled “Gun Violence Prediction and Prevention – APA Policy Development, Dissemination and Implementation.” Some others: males constitute 90 percent of gun violence perpetrators and 70 percent of homicide victims. And there is a one in 144,000 chance that a person with schizophrenia will kill a stranger, according to Joel A. Dvoskin, PhD, of the University of Arizona College of Medicine.

“The myth is you have to be crazy to shoot a bunch of people,” Dvoskin said. “There is no evidence that people with serious mental illness are more likely to commit gun violence” than people without mental illness.

The common traits among people who commit gun violence are anger, depression, despair and social awkwardness, among others Dvoskin said. “In other words, profiles are stupid,” he said. “Profiles are stereotypes that blind us” to people who pose real risks.

The United States needs to take a science-based public health approach to stemming gun violence, treating guns like other dangerous products, said Robert Kinscherff, PhD, JD, of the Massachusetts School of Professional Psychology. This approach would take into account product design, safety features and improvements in how people store guns.

Finally, more research is required, said Gary D. Gottfredson, PhD, of the University of Maryland-College Park. “We don’t know an awful lot,” he said. “We lack a national system for uniformly collecting information about firearms violence. … That has to end.”

2 thoughts on “How Do We Stem Gun Violence in America?

  1. “American women are 11 times more likely to be murdered by someone using a gun than women in other democratic countries with developed economies,” – false
    It is hard to take much of the rest of the article as reasonable when the initial statement is so wrong and bias.
    Second, “gun violence” is a made up term, guns are not violent or non-violent, not good or evil, they are just objects in the hands of the people that control them. So, first thing that has to take place is to phase the problem as how to increase the rate of decline of criminal violence, since criminal violence (including when a gun is used as a tool) is at a 20 year low and getting lower every year, especially in places where CCW is increasing.
    The CDC numbers are meaningless in most discussions in that they do not make a distinction between a criminal shot by a police officer or a police officer that is shot by a criminal. So, if we really want meaningful data, we need to use the FBI numbers and we need for states/cities to be more uniform in the reporting of the numbers. Many times the counts are off either by intentional under reporting (e.g. NY, IL, CA) or over reporting by reporting the same event for each charge presented to the court (e.g. Houston). Maybe we should take some of the money given to the CDC and give it to the FBI and states to make uniform reporting better. The other thing that is not tracked is the case where a person stops a violent crime with a gun but does not shoot someone. These reports are not recorded and they should be. It would be really nice to narrow down the current estimates that vary from 1 to 11 million every year.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s